Sources

  • Ahlers, Jocelyn C. “The Many Meanings of Collaboration: Fieldwork with the Elem Pomo.” Language & Communication 29, no. 3 (July 2009): 230–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.005.
  • Austin, Peter K, and Julia Sallabank. “Language Documentation and Language Revitalization – Some Methodological Considerations,” 2017, 12.
  • Austin, Peter, and Julia Sallabank. Endangered Languages: Beliefs and Ideologies in Language Documentation and Revitalization, 2014.
  • Benedicto, Elena, Demetrio Antolín, Modesta Dolores, M Cristina Feliciano, Gloria Fendly, Tomasa Gómez, Baudilio Miguel, and Elizabeth Salomón. “A Model of Participatory Action Research: The Mayangna Linguists Team of Nicaragua,” n.d., 7.
  • Berez, Andrea L., Jean Mulder, and Daisy Rosenblum. Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas. University of Hawai’i Press, 2010. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/4463.
  • Bischoff, Shannon T, and Carmen Jany. Insights from Practices in Community-Based Research: From Theory to Practice around the Globe, 2018.
  • Bowern, Claire, and Natasha Warner. “‘Lone Wolves’ and Collaboration: A Reply to Crippen & Robinson (2013).” Language Documentation, 2015, 27.
  • Burling, Robbins. Learning a Field Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984.
  • Chelliah, Shobhana Lakshmi, and Willem Joseph de Reuse. Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. Dordrecht [Netherlands]; New York: Springer, 2011. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=666683.
  • Cole, Courtney E. “Stories from the Lived and Living Fieldwork Process.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management; Bradford 8, no. 1 (2013): 50–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465641311327513.
  • Cope, Lida. Applied Linguists Needed: Cross-Disciplinary Teamwork in Endangered Language Contexts. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.
  • Crippen, James A, and Laura C Robinson. “In Defense of the Lone Wolf: Collaboration in Language Documentation.” Language Documentation 7 (2013): 13.
  • Crowley, Terry, and Nick Thieberger. Field Linguistics: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10171020.
  • Dobrin, Lise M., and Saul Schwartz. “Collaboration or Participant Observation? Rethinking Models of ‘Linguistic Social Work,’” June 2016. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/24694.
  • Driem, George van. “Endangered Language Research and the Moral Depravity of Ethics Protocols.” Language Documentation 10 (2016): 10.
  • Gasser, Emily. “The Right to Say Yes: Language Documentation in West Papua.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 37, no. 4 (2017): 502–26.
  • Grenoble, Lenore A, and Louanna Furbee-Losee. Language Documentation: Practice and Values. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2010.
  • Grenoble, Lenore A, and Lindsay J Whaley. Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • Guérin, Valérie, and Sébastien Lacrampe. “Trust Me, I Am a Linguist! Building Partnership in the Field.” Language Documentation 4 (2010): 12.
  • Hale, Ken, Michael Krauss, Lucille J. Watahomigie, Akira Y. Yamamoto, Colette Craig, LaVerne Masayesva Jeanne, and Nora C. England. “Endangered Languages.” Language 68, no. 1 (1992): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/416368.
  • Harrison, K. David, David S Rood, and Arienne M Dwyer. Lessons from Documented Endangered Languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008.
  • Heller, Monica, and Alexandre Duchêne. Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London; New York: Continuum, 2007.
  • Hinton, Leanne, and Kenneth L Hale. The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. San Diego: Academic Press, 2001.
  • Mihas, Elena I. “Subcontracting Native Speakers in Linguistic Fieldwork: A Case Study of the Ashéninka Perené (Arawak) Research Community from the Peruvian Amazon,” February 2012. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/4502.
  • Nagy, N. “What I Didn’t Know about Working in an Endangered Language Community: Some Fieldwork Issues.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE, no. 144 (2000): 143–60.
  • Pandey, Tulsi Ram. “Methods of Field Research : Encounter, Experiences and Strategies in Nepali Villages.” Contributions to Nepalese Studies 35, no. 1 (2008): 83–108.
  • Pawley, Andrew. “Review of The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork.” Language Documentation 9 (2015): 6.
  • Perley, Bernard C. “Zombie Linguistics: Experts, Endangered Languages and the Curse of Undead Voices.” Anthropological Forum 22, no. 2 (July 1, 2012): 133–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694170.
  • Rice, Keren. “Documentary Linguistics and Community Relations,” December 2011. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/4498.
  • Rice, Keren. “Ethical Issues In Linguistic Fieldwork: An Overview.” Journal of Academic Ethics 4, no. 1–4 (January 10, 2007): 123–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9016-2.
  • Rice, Sally. “Applied Field Linguistics: Delivering Linguistic Training to Speakers of Endangered Languages.” Language and Education 25, no. 4 (2011): 319–38.
  • Robinson, Laura C. “Informed Consent among Analog People in a Digital World.” Language & Communication, Ethical Dimensions of Language Documentation, 30, no. 3 (July 1, 2010): 186–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.11.002.
  • Schneider, Cynthia. “Why Field Linguists Should Pay More Attention to Research in Applied Linguistics.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 31, no. 2 (2011): 187–209.
  • Schütz, Albert J. “Portrait of the Linguist as a Young Man: Linguistic Fieldwork on Nguna (Vanuatu) in 1966.” Anthropological Linguistics 52, no. 3–4 (2010): 358–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2010.0025.
  • Sherzer, Joel. “Langage et culture : une approche centrée sur le discours, A Discourse-Centered Approach to Language and Culture.” Langage et société, no. 139 (March 2, 2012): 21–45. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.139.0021.
  • Speas, Margaret. “Someone Else’s Language: On the Role of Linguists in Language Revitalization.” In Indigenous Language Revitalization: Encouragement, Guidance & Lessons Learned, edited by Jon Reyhner and Louise Lockard, 23–36. Flagstaff; Arizona: Northern Arizona University, n.d.
  • Stebbins, Tonya. “On Being a Linguist and Doing Linguistics: Negotiating Ideology through Performativity,” December 2012. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/4501.
  • Tanu, Danau, and Laura Dales. “Language in Fieldwork: Making Visible the Ethnographic Impact of the Researcher’s Linguistic Fluency.” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 27, no. 3 (2016): 353–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12150.
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada., 2015. http://www.myrobust.com/websites/trcinstitution/File/Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf.
  • Turin, Mark, Claire Wheeler, and Eleanor Wilkinson. Oral Literature in the Digital Age: Archiving Orality and Connecting with Communities, 2013. http://www.doabooks.org/doab?func=fulltext&rid=15435.
  • Viñas de Puig, Ricard, Mayangna Yulbarangyang Balna, and Elena Benedicto. “Linguistic and Technical Training as a Community Empowerment Tool: The Case of the Mayangna Linguists’ Team in Nicaragua.” International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS) 6, no. 1 (2012): 81–94.
  • Wichroski, Mary Anne. “Breaking Silence: Some Fieldwork Strategies in Cloistered and Non-Cloistered Communities.” Qualitative Sociology 19, no. 1 (March 1, 1996): 153–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393252.
  • Wilkins, David. “Linguistic Research under Aboriginal Control: A Personal Account of Fieldwork in Central Australia.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 12, no. 1 (June 1, 1992): 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609208599475.
  • Yamada, Racquel-María. “Collaborative Linguistic Fieldwork: Practical Application of the Empowerment Model.” Language Documentation 1, no. 2 (2007): 26.
Advertisements